Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU - experiences
2012-07-16 09:11:00
We recently converted to a special hybrid license that is a combination of
PVU and STG based. We are ~600TB primary occupancy (constantly growing)
but have a lot of high-powered multi-processor systems (in research
computing) so it worked out cheaper (per my guy who does licensing) to go
to the STG/SUR licensing for the smaller/non-research systems backups. The
additional software packages bundled into SUR (no more separate licensing
for TDP products) is an added bonus.
Our hybrid agreement required us to create a separate TSM server for the
PVU licensed nodes, which is ~15% of total occupancy)
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Ian Smith <ian.smith AT oucs.ox.ac DOT uk>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are in the midst of discussions on moving to capacity-based licensing
> from the standard PVU-based method for our site. We have a large number of
> clients ( licensed via TSM-EE, TDP agents, and on client-device basis ) and
> around 1PB of primary pool data. As I understand it, there is no published
> metric for the conversion from PVU to per TB licensing so I would be really
> interested and grateful if anyone would like to share their experiences of
> that conversion in a private email to me.
>
> Many thanks in advance.
> Ian Smith
> Oxford University
> England
>
--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
|
|
|