Re: Pricing model for 5.4
2007-02-14 07:53:33
>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:22:28 +1000, Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT
>> INFO> said:
> I'm not so sure about this. One of our customers took a rather cavalier
> attitude to TSM licencing, and were using about 3 times as many licences
> as they'd paid for. IBM via PriceWaterhouseCoopers came in one day
> (possibly triggered by the fact that there had been no new orders for
> licences in a couple of years) and demanded an audit. Said company then
> had to pony up for all the extra licences *at FULL LIST price*. No
> negotiation and no questions accepted. The alternative would have
> involved lawyers and therefore cost a lot more.
I think I can understand this response out of IBM; no growth at all
over several years seems odd.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, (continued)
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, Remco Post
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, Allen S. Rout
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, Steven Harris
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4,
Allen S. Rout <=
- Re: Pricing model for 5.4, Allen S. Rout
- Re: dsmc -nodename, Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós y Márquez
Re: VTL's (looking for info), Leigh Reed
Re: VTL's (looking for info), Roger Deschner
|
|
|