Re: Collocation from nocollocation
2003-07-29 13:10:50
Bill,
I made this change a while back without any real problems. I just enabled
collocation. It took some time but eventually my tapepool became
collocated. Also, TSM shouldn't crash because it ran out of scratch tapes.
Remember, if TSM runs out of scratch tapes it will find the least used tape
and write on it. You loose collocation on that tape but TSM continues on. I
can think of only two situations that running out of scratch tapes would be
a major problem, 1-when a database backup is needed and 2-every tape in the
storage pool has become full. With a little planning and monitoring you
should be able to detect and take corrective action before TSM dies.
Also, if your drive mount retention is set to high you'll have a bunch of
idle tape drives. Remember, collocation will force a mount of at least one
tape for each node. So, make sure that you don't use the default of 60
minutes. Cut it back to say 5 minutes so that the drives will be freed up
quickly.
Rick Saylor
Austin Community College
At 11:22 AM 7/29/2003 -0400, you wrote
Hi TSM'ers
Has anybody out there gone from 3 years of nocollocation and then
changed to collocation for better restores. We are currently at 2-3+ TB of
info on 540 tapes (this is all in our 1 TAPEPOOL). We have about 410
scratch tapes and the uppers are worried about making the global switch to
collocate will cause TSM to crash due to no scratch tapes. Also if there
are any other gotcha's I would be greatly appreciated. Maybe even send
you, some of our greatest pizza haha.
Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Saylor Austin Community College Voice: (512)223-1182
Senior Systems Programmer 9101 Tuscany Way Fax: (512)223-1211
Information Services Austin, Texas 78754
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, William Rosette
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation,
Rick Saylor <=
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Kamp, Bruce
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, William Rosette
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Richard Sims
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Gill, Geoffrey L.
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Kamp, Bruce
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, David E Ehresman
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Steve Harris
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Tudor,Troy,VEVEY,GL-IS/IT
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Richard Sims
|
|
|