Re: Collocation from nocollocation
2003-07-29 19:10:35
Bill,
1. I think 1 tape pool is a bad idea. Not every machine needs a fast recovery
and big database backups won't benefit much from it. Split your nodes into
different domains and don't collocate the tape stgpool of one of them.
2. Insert your new collocated tape pool between disk and the current tapepool.
Use maxscr as others have indicated. In the unlikely event that you ever
completely fill up the collocated pool it wil automatically flow into the
non-collocated one and no data will be lost.
HTH
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
>>> Bill_Rosette AT PAPAJOHNS DOT COM 30/07/2003 1:22:53 >>>
Hi TSM'ers
Has anybody out there gone from 3 years of nocollocation and then
changed to collocation for better restores. We are currently at 2-3+ TB of
info on 540 tapes (this is all in our 1 TAPEPOOL). We have about 410
scratch tapes and the uppers are worried about making the global switch to
collocate will cause TSM to crash due to no scratch tapes. Also if there
are any other gotcha's I would be greatly appreciated. Maybe even send
you, some of our greatest pizza haha.
Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD
***********************************************************************************
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the
sole use of the intended recipients(s). This confidentiality is not waived or
lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is
transmitted/received in error.
Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this
email is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality
if it relates to health service matters.
If you are not the intended recipients(s), or if you have received this e-mail
in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by
return e-mail. You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy any hard
copies produced.
***********************************************************************************
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, William Rosette
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Kamp, Bruce
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, William Rosette
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Richard Sims
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Gill, Geoffrey L.
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Kamp, Bruce
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, David E Ehresman
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation,
Steve Harris <=
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Tudor,Troy,VEVEY,GL-IS/IT
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Richard Sims
|
|
|