Re: Quickie question,
1998-04-09 05:36:28
I have had a couple of different replies to this,
Some of you have said, Yup, it does return a status of missed,
some have said it doesnt.
I have now tested it and seen it report missed when the job
completed outside the window, although I did originally think that it
should report completed.
Is there some quirk that is causing both types of behaviour? I
shall investigate further.........
Matthew Warren.
HOIST - Head Office Infrastructure Support Team.
ADSM (FAB) + Unix support.
Marks & Spencer Plc.
Baker Street.
London.
Email: matthew.warren AT marks-and-spencer DOT com
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Hi Mathew,
>
> Nowhere do you define within the ADSM schedule how long a scheduled
> job
> should take. You nominate a start time, and then a window in witch the
> job should start. So, if you specify a start time of midnight, and a
> startup window of 2 hours, the job must start by 2am, or it will show
> up
> as 'Missed'. But the job could run until after 2am, and still finish
> with a 'Completed' status.
>
>
> Trevor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Warren
> Hello All,
>
> Just a quick point,
>
> If a schedule takes longer than its duration to
> complete, bit
> still completes fine, am I right in that the scheduler still
> shows the
> status as missed?
>
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Quickie question,,
Matthew Warren <=
|
|
|