ADSM-L

Re: ADSM and the NT Service

1997-11-17 13:35:21
Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service
From: "Moir,Elizabeth" <Elizabeth.Moir AT LN.SSW.ABBOTT DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 12:35:21 -0600
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you!  That was exactly what
the problem was!  As soon as we disabled VirusScan the service installed
properly and everything worked just fine.

Thanks to all of you for your help.

A question to IBM:  Does this mean that this end user can't run VirusScan
anymore, or was it simply because VirusScan was running when I was trying to
install?




ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 11/17/97 11:35:39 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service

If you have any anti virus software running shut it down and try again.
This may help.
Bruce




Elizabeth.Moir AT LN.SSW.ABBOTT DOT COM on 11/17/97 11:05:51

Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: R Bruce McCauley/HI/CSC)
Subject:  Re: ADSM and the NT Service




I creep painfully, centimeter by centimeter closer to the possible cause of
the problem - After uninstalling and reinstalling both the service and the
software, I ran the scheduler using the DOS command line and it just
blipped.  Then I tried to run the incremental using the command line and at
last I got some messages anyway.  Apparently, when I use the DSMCSVCI,
either
from the GUI or from the command line, it's not creating a nodename
registry
entry.  The message stated that and when I went to look for it there was
nothing there.
We use this software on several NT servers and on a couple NT workstations,
but I have two clients that this is happening to.  With this further
information, anybody have any thoughts?  And thanks to everybody for their
suggestions so far.  I would NEVER have gotten this far without you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth D Moir/LAKE/CHMS/ABBOTT on
11/17/97 09:54 AM ---------------------------
11/17/97 09:54 AM ---------------------------

ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 11/13/97 11:21:29 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service
Beth,
 Check your NT event logs.  This is a really strange problem and hopefully
something will show up in either the system or application log.  This
sounds like a relatively serious problem, a corrupt DLL or bad memory chip
or something.  If you see nothing wrong with any other application I would
definitely open a problem with IBM.
Let us know,
 Dan T.
----------
> From: Moir,Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Moir AT LN.SSW.ABBOTT DOT COM>
> From: Moir,Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Moir AT LN.SSW.ABBOTT DOT COM>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service
> Date: Thursday, November 13, 1997 7:26 AM
>
> I'm really appreciate everybody's input on this.  To answer some of the
> questions . . . . .
>
> I have installed the latest V2 version.
> I checked the dsmerror.log and there is nothing in there.
>
> I just went over to run dsmc to look at the messages as suggested here
and lo
> and behold it doesn't even run.  There's a little blip on the screen and
I'm
> right back to the C:\Win32app\IBM\ADSM\BACLIENT prompt.  I checked to see
if
> the executable was even there and it is.  I ran DSMSCVC.exe and that ran
> fine.
>
> Does anybody think this could possibly be a memory problem?
>
> Again, thanks for all the help so far.
>
>
>
>
> ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 11/13/97 06:57:05 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU @ INTERNET
> cc:
> Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service
>
> Beth,
>
>   I agree with the advice of attempting to run the DSMC.exe from a
command
>   prompt to see if it will display other messages.  I have run into ADSM
> complaining about not finding certain files before.  FYI.  The nodename
> being unreadable in the registry is not right.  If you had run the
dsmcsvci
> (I assume you had) it should have been fine.  I have had to manually
enter
> the the clientnodename correctly before.
>
> Are you on the latest client code? 2.1.0.6g, I think.
>
> Dan T.
>
> ----------
> > From: Moir,Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Moir AT LN.SSW.ABBOTT DOT COM>
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service
> > Date: Wednesday, November 12, 1997 2:25 PM
> >
> > Here's what I've done so far.
> >
> > 1.  I pinged VM (that's the alias for our ADSM server) - That worked
> okay.
> > 2.  I pinged the ADSM server IP address - That worked okay.
> > 3.  I  changed the TCPServerAddress in the options file to the full
> address
> > instead of the alias.  I tried to execute the ADSM Client.  It blipped
on
> the
> > screen and disappeared.
> > 4.  I uninstalled the NT Service and tried to execute the ADSM Client.
> Same
> > blip.
> > 5.  I uninstalled the entire ADSM client and reinstalled it.  (Compact
> > install, all defaults accepted.)  Tried to execute the ADSM Client.
Same
> > blip.
> >
> > When I look at my ADSM server logs, this node isn't even making it to
the
> > server.  There's no activity there at all.
> >
> > At one point when I was just trying to look at the registry entries
(via
> > dsmcscvi) it showed the clientnodename as being one of those playing
card
> > unprintables (a spade, I think) which leads me to believe the registry
> isn't
> > getting updated.
> >
> > Also, I made sure this person had administrator and backup operator
> rights.
> >
> > Everything seems to be working except ADSM and I am at a complete loss
as
> to
> > why.  Does anybody think I should try Version 3.  At this point, I
don't.
>  My
> > instincts tell me this has something to do with NT not ADSM.  I even
> > uninstalled my own NT machine and reinstalled it just to make sure
> everything
> > still worked on my machine.  It did.  We have lots of NT servers using
> ADSM,
> > but only a couple workstations (mine being one of them).  Two of these
> > workstations won't work.  I'm open to any and all, creative or bizarre
> ideas.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 11/11/97 09:16:56 AM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU @ INTERNET
> > cc:
> > Subject: Re: ADSM and the NT Service
> >
> > We had this problem.
> >
> > In our case, DNS was not resolving the ADSM Server machine name as
> specified
> > in
> > the dsm.opt file.
> >
> > Check this by issuing a PING command from your client to the server to
> check
> > the
> > network connectivity between the machines.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > Phil Chissell       phil.chissell AT research.natpower.co DOT uk
> >
> > This represents the view of the author alone and is not to be
> > considered as the position of National Power PLC
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>