Micromuse is the future
James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
Jeff Fitzwater
<jfitz@princeton.
edu> To
Sent by: Tivoli NetView Discussions
nv-l-bounces@list <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
s.ca.ibm.com cc
Subject
07/21/2006 10:31 Re: [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH
AM ANALYZER packaged with NV
Please respond to
Tivoli NetView
Discussions
<nv-l AT lists.ca DOT ib
m.com>
Thank you James.
So does that mean the IBM product that will do this, will continue
to be Netview, or a new product under MicroMuse (Performance IP maybe)?
We use the TEC and yes the Netview is kind of a freebee under Princeton
agreement.
Jeff Fitzwater
OIT Network Systems
Princeton University
James Shanks wrote:
> I don't know how "good" the reason is but there is one. Remember that
the
> basic design of NetView is about fifteen years old, and for much of that
> time, layer 2 visibility wasn't required. Layer 3 was sufficient. It's
> only newer technologies like VLAN, MPLS, wireless, and so on, which make
> it essential for managing those things. Enter Switch Analyzer. Switch
> Analyzer is not part of the NetView base, but was developed externally by
> Magnum Technology and IBM has been licensing the code from them, as well
as
> continuing support and development. It's recovering all that new
> investment in a short time which makes the code so expensive. The rest
> of NetView is practically free. Heck, it is free if you buy TEC.
>
> But you are right, Jeff. A comprehensive network management solution
> should include built-in layer 2 visibility, full-support for SNMPv1, v2,
> and v3, and more. And that's our direction. That's why IBM purchased
> Micromuse.
>
> James Shanks
> Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
> Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
>
>
>
> Jeff Fitzwater
> <jfitz@princeton.
> edu>
To
> Sent by: Netview at IBM
> nv-l-bounces@list <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
> s.ca.ibm.com
cc
>
>
Subject
> 07/20/2006 12:11 [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER
> PM packaged with NV
>
>
> Please respond to
> Tivoli NetView
> Discussions
> <nv-l AT lists.ca DOT ib
> m.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Is there a good reason why SWITCH ANALYZER is not part of the Netview
> package?
>
> It would seem that a level2 node mapping would be part of any product
> like this.
>
> I have been looking at adding the product, but is cost prohibitive due
> to pricing.
>
> Education price 8.00 per switch port and 4k per host processor.
>
> We have 15k switch ports = 120,000
> host has 2 900MHz Process = 8,000
> Maintenance per Yr 5,000
> ------------------------------------------
> Total cost would be ~$133,000
>
>
>
> I could lower the cost a little by upgrading the host to a single 2k
> processor. That makes sense!?
>
>
> I have talked with sales, but no break there.
>
>
> Any comments please.
>
>
> Jeff Fitzwater
> OIT Network Systems
> Princeton University
> _______________________________________________
> NV-L mailing list
> NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
> Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
> http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
> internal IBM'ers only)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NV-L mailing list
> NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
> Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
> http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
>
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
|
