nv-l

Re: [nv-l] Another MIB Question?

2006-04-19 08:58:58
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Another MIB Question?
From: Larry Fagan <larrytechie AT yahoo DOT com>
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Joe,
Thank you very much. That's a good catch.. I downloaded the latest from Cisco and concatenated two MIb's (without CISCO-TC now). This worked very sweet and i have all trap definitions with OID's.
James,
Thanks again for the helping hand...
Larry


Joe Fernandez <jfernand AT kardinia DOT com> wrote:
Larry,

Do you specifically want to use this version of the MIB?

Cisco has a later version of this MIB on its web site. Your version has a 2002 timestamp (see below) and there is a 2004 version out.

The latest version no longer requires CISCO-TC, so all you need to run mib2trap is to prepend CISCO-SMI.


At 01:44 PM 18-04-06 -0700, you wrote:
Guys,
I have question here on the mib i'm working on. This is the MIb file. "CISCO-CONTENT-ENGINE-MIB.my". I'm running mib2trap on this and obviously i'm not getting any OID's for the traps since i have not yet concatenated the other MIB files into one.
Can anyone tell me what are the MIB's i should concatenate based on the imports section from the above MIb file. And what is the order to concatenate. Part of the imports is below:

CISCO-CONTENT-ENGINE-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS
    MODULE-IDENTITY,
    OBJECT-TYPE,
    NOTIFICATION-TYPE,
    Counter32,
    Counter64, Gauge32                  FROM SNMPv2-SMI
    MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP,
    NOTIFICATION-GROUP                  FROM SNMPv2-CONF
    Unsigned32                          FROM CISCO-TC
    ciscoMgmt                           FROM CISCO-SMI;

ciscoContentEngineMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
    LAST-UPDATED "200205200000Z"


Should it just be "CISCO-TC", "CISCO-SMI" & " CISCO-CONTENT-ENGINE-MIB.my"?
Many Thanks as usual.

Larry




Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Joe Fernandez
Kardinia Software
jfernand AT kardinia DOT com


How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low PC-to-Phone call rates.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>