Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions

Subject:	Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions
From:	Brett Coley <bcoley AT us.ibm DOT com>
To:	nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date:	Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:44:14 -0400

That sounds like a valid way to test, but I'm thinking

you may want to throw in some more randomness, maybe

some heavier peaks. Sounds like the 250 in 50 secs are

dealt with ok in their 10 minute window, but what happens

with a burst of 1000 thrown into the mix?

Regards,

Brett

Tivoli Software/IBM

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage) Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Brett Coley <= RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Barr, Scott RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage) RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Francois Le Hir RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Barr, Scott RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, James Shanks RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Leslie Clark RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Barr, Scott RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage) RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage) RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Barr, Scott