RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions

Subject:

From:

"Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>

To:

Date:

Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:03:22 -0500

One other thing - the use of smartsets and rulesets heavily affects performance. It would be beneficial if your testing included a variety of traps, not the same one over and over. In addition, pushing them through rulesets if possible would be a real good stress test especially if you have rulesets doing a "query smartset" node.

Would you be willing to share your script that generates the traps? I am interested in doing the same thing.

From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of Brett Coley
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:44 AM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions

That sounds like a valid way to test, but I'm thinking

you may want to throw in some more randomness, maybe

some heavier peaks. Sounds like the 250 in 50 secs are

dealt with ok in their 10 minute window, but what happens

with a burst of 1000 thrown into the mix?

Regards,

Brett

bcoley AT us.ibm DOT com

Tivoli Software/IBM

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Brett Coley

Next by Date:

RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage)

Previous by Thread:

Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Brett Coley

Next by Thread:

RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions, Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage)

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]