|
This get's more interesting all the time. The DNS
entry for the hub router that the ATM circuit is connected to is 10.0.200.1, but
the version 6x Netview is showing 10.0.195.1, which is one of the other
interfaces on the router. The v7 Netview is showing it as it's proper DNS
name and correct IP address.
Think we should just delete that router from all the
submaps and let it rediscover?
Make
sure that the "community" string, as reported by the following command, is the
same on both servers:
xnmsnmpconf -res DeviceName
Where
"DeviceName" is the "Selection Name" of the Network device in
question.
Raymond Erdey
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
System
Administrator
Network Management System
Administration
Email:
raymond.m.erdey AT erac DOT com
Web: http://www.geocities.com/rerdey/
> does NetView 7.x and NetView 6.x have the exact same interfaces
discovered
Yes
> CPU comment was for the network device, not the NetView
servers
Sorry I miss-understood. I'm not sure how this
would make a difference... they both get the same information from the network
device and the v6 Netview always shows it up, while the v7 Netview shows it
red. If the CPU was pegging out at 100% it seams that both server
databases would be effected.
> you see them both doing ICMP polls?
No, they both do SNMP.
Thanks
Let me be more specific... :-)
For that ATM device... does NetView
7.x and NetView 6.x have the exact same interfaces discovered? If you do an
ovobjprint <hostname> do you see the same number of interfaces from both
NetViews?
The CPU comment was for the network device, not the NetView
servers. When you do a demandpoll (from both NetViews) you see them both doing
ICMP polls?
Stephen Hochstetler shochste AT us.ibm DOT com
International
Technical Support Organization at IBM
Office - 512-838-6198 (t/l 678) FAX -
512-838-6931
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com
| 