nv-l

[nv-l] Maximum number of interfaces per router

2003-11-04 08:33:30
Subject: [nv-l] Maximum number of interfaces per router
From: "Pritesh Jewan" <Pritesh AT aptronics.co DOT za>
To: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:14:49 +0200

Hi List,

I am trying to determine the maximum number of interfaces per a router that Netview can discover and manage. I found an article on the IBM support site that states that Netview on NT and 2000 support a maximum of 256 interfaces per router.

Is this the same for Unix/Linux ? I have a customer that wants to install NetView 7.1.4 on Redhat Advanced Server 2.1 and will be managing a Cisco 7200 series router with 400 interfaces. Has anyone run into problems managing routers with large number of interfaces ?

Thank You

Pritesh

Pritesh Jewan
Aptronics (Pty) Ltd
Tel   : +27 (0) 11 577 0800
Fax  : +27 (0) 11 326 4921
Cell : +27 (0) 84-677-2486

pritesh AT aptronics.co DOT za

*** Aptronics…Has Moved !

Please take note of new address and contact details.

 

Physical Address :          

Aptronics House, 288 Main avenue                 

Cnr. Main and Harley        

Ferndale, 2194

 

Postal Address:

P.O. Box 2732, Randburg, 2125

 

Telephone : (011) 577-0800

Facsimile : (011) 326-4921

 

 

Legal Disclaimer: This E-mail, it's attachment/s and the information that it contains is/are confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access to this E-mail, it's attachment/s, and the information it contains is/are for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this Email , do not read, disclose, disseminate or use the information in any way.

 

Any views in this communication are those of the sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Aptronics (PTY) Ltd. Aptronics (PTY) Ltd and the sender does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of errors or virus nor does it guarantee that it has not been intercepted or interfered with en-route.

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>