|
Re: [nv-l] SNMPv3
2002-05-01 14:47:04
"CATALINA MARTINEZ" <CATALINA.MARTINEZ AT tlc.state.tx DOT us> writes:
> From what I read it became standard 2/2002?
snmpv3 became a full standard in March of 2002 according to:
http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/ietf/snmpv3/
> >>> "Key, Chris" <Chris.Key AT hq.doe DOT gov> 05/01/02 12:24PM >>>
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't SNMP "v3" still an un-ratified
> standard? Any implementations would be vendor proprietary right?
>
> I would think NetView support would come after a final standard.
>
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [nv-l] SNMPv3, CATALINA MARTINEZ
- Re: [nv-l] SNMPv3, James Shanks
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, Treptow, Craig
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, CATALINA MARTINEZ
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, Salas, Ana
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, James Shanks
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, Key, Chris
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, CATALINA MARTINEZ
- Re: [nv-l] SNMPv3, Todd H.
- Re: [nv-l] SNMPv3,
Todd H. <=
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, Key, Chris
- RE: [nv-l] SNMPv3, Cochran, Steve A.
- Re: [nv-l] SNMPv3, CATALINA MARTINEZ
|
|
|
