Re: [nv-l] costs of automatic actions vs. ruleset
2002-05-21 14:33:01
"Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com> writes:
> 2. For the ruleset that is called to forward events to TEC, it should
> have absolutely NO action blocks in that ruleset.
Hi Stephen,
Could you share your reasoning/experience that lead to this
suggestion? (nervously considers all the action nodes in my ruleset)
> 3. Any ruleset that has action blocks should be called from
> ESE.automation. This ruleset should have a default box of BLOCK...and
> have absolutely no FORWARD EVENT blocks. All event streams should end in
> a BLOCK box after all actions have taken place.
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/
|
|
|