nv-l

[nv-l] costs of automatic actions vs. ruleset

2002-05-21 12:49:59
Subject: [nv-l] costs of automatic actions vs. ruleset
From: "Austin, Jon (FUSA)" <JonAustin AT firstusa DOT com>
To: "'nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com'" <nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:49:59 -0400
I'm looking to process some data from a specific set of traps upon reception
and wanted the learned opinions of 
the list of which method is the least resource intensive.

Method 1: Program in automatic actions directly into the trap definitions

Method 2: Set up a ruleset (ESE.automation) to do the work.

Does either technique have an advantage in resources used, maintainability,
etc....??

I would definitely like to stay away from external trapd.log processing
because it'll involve working around the 
automatic log snap features...


Jon C Austin AVP
Enterprise Management
Technology Operations
First USA Bank, NA 
(302)282-3498 (phone)
JonAustin AT FirstUSA DOT com
8884631595 AT skytel DOT com(pager)



**********************************************************************
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
**********************************************************************


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>