I tried this a while back, I don't think it worked for
me either.  Because an IP address is normally
associated with a NIC, and which is a subcomponent of
a Node.  So if you AND the result of the IP Address
search with isNode, it won't work.  Right now, I don't
know of any way to create a smartset of Nodes using
strictly IP Addresses.

May be James and Leslie can enlighten us on how this
can be done, or just tell us that it's impossible.


--- "Boyles, Gary P" <gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM> wrote:
> To anyone,
> I ws wondering if anyone on NT has gotten this kind
> of smartset example
> to work  (mine doesn't seem to cut it).
>
> 1)  I'm trying to create a smartset using:
> *       "IP Properties" (Using Wildcards) "IP
> Address"
> *       I put in the address such as   132.233.*
>
> 2) I do an "Add To Advanced", and then try to AND
> this with
> *       "Other Properties" (Type) "Node".
>
> The result is... I never get anything in my
> smartset, even though
> I have many nodes in the address-range, and it
> doesn't find any of them.
>
> BTW -- I've tried using "132.233.*.*", and
> "132.233*, and "132.233.*".
>
> Same results.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gary Boyles
>

===
Xu He
Consulting Services Engineer
Network Solutions, Inc
http://www.netsol.com/consulting
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com