nv-l

Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.

1999-06-11 10:39:38
Subject: Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.
From: KG KG <kkg001 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:39:38 PDT
I have seen IP Address wildcards work..

What failed for me was - when I try to pick up  vendor specific devices by
sysObjectId=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.* (Using the appropriate syntax), it doesnt come
up with a list.

Arent IBM tweaks shakey?


From: "Boyles, Gary P" <gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM>
Reply-To: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
       <NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu>
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
Subject: Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:02:10 -0700

James,
It seemed to work fine for a single selection (as you describe below),
where the problem comes in... is if you try to AND it with something
else.

Question:  Did you try this to, or just the single condition?

Thanks.

Gary Boyles


-----Original Message-----
From: James Shanks [mailto:James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 2:53 PM
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
Subject: Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.


I don't know what to tell you guys.  I have 5.1.1 installed and I did just
what Gary did and it works only too well for me.
I  selected "IP Properties" and "Using Wildcards", clicked the IP Address
radio button, and used the Tivoli subnet  146.84.*.*, and then hit APPLY.
I got a huge number of hits.


James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support



Xu He <xuhe AT YAHOO DOT COM> on 06/10/99 04:49:59 PM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:  Re: NetView NT Smartset Problem.





I tried this a while back, I don't think it worked for
me either.  Because an IP address is normally
associated with a NIC, and which is a subcomponent of
a Node.  So if you AND the result of the IP Address
search with isNode, it won't work.  Right now, I don't
know of any way to create a smartset of Nodes using
strictly IP Addresses.

May be James and Leslie can enlighten us on how this
can be done, or just tell us that it's impossible.


--- "Boyles, Gary P" <gary.p.boyles AT INTEL DOT COM> wrote:
> To anyone,
> I ws wondering if anyone on NT has gotten this kind
> of smartset example
> to work  (mine doesn't seem to cut it).
>
> 1)  I'm trying to create a smartset using:
> *       "IP Properties" (Using Wildcards) "IP
> Address"
> *       I put in the address such as   132.233.*
>
> 2) I do an "Add To Advanced", and then try to AND
> this with
> *       "Other Properties" (Type) "Node".
>
> The result is... I never get anything in my
> smartset, even though
> I have many nodes in the address-range, and it
> doesn't find any of them.
>
> BTW -- I've tried using "132.233.*.*", and
> "132.233*, and "132.233.*".
>
> Same results.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gary Boyles
>

===
Xu He
Consulting Services Engineer
Network Solutions, Inc
http://www.netsol.com/consulting
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com