nv-l

Re: ovwdb - high CPU

1999-05-20 12:39:08
Subject: Re: ovwdb - high CPU
From: "MENEZES, ALAIN" <a.menezes AT ASLK-CGER DOT BE>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 18:39:08 +0200
This works fine ...
A little addition : when you configure a cache size 0, ovwdb can use as
much as it needs for its cache !

Thanks again
---------------------
Alain Menezes   
ASLK-CGER Services GIE                          Tel.:  +32 2 228.55.74
Rue Fossé-aux-Loups, 48                               Fax.:  +32 2 228.83.69
1000  Bruxelles                                         Email:
a.menezes AT aslk-cger DOT be




> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Shanks [SMTP:James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM]
> Sent: jeudi 20 mai 1999 17:40
> To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: ovwdb - high CPU
> 
> Do ovobjprint -S and look at the number of objects.  Then check the
> ovwdb
> cache size (ps -ef | grep ovwdb and look at the -n value).  Is the
> cache
> size at least 20 per cent bigger? If not, use the Configure menu in
> the
> Tivoli GUI to make it that way.  Then restart the daemons and see what
> happens.
> 
> James Shanks
> Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
> 
> 
> 
> "MENEZES, ALAIN" <a.menezes AT ASLK-CGER DOT BE> on 05/20/99 11:26:03 AM
> 
> Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
>       NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>
> 
> To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
> cc:    (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
> Subject:  ovwdb - high CPU
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've copied a NetView DB from one server to another (tar, reset_ci)
> both
> on the same subnet. Everything seems fine except that the ovwdb
> process
> uses an average 70% of CPU ... At first I thought the db was
> synchronizing, but the transfer has been done 7 days ago !!!
> 
> Could anyone help me investigate the problem ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Al
> ---------------------
> Alain Menezes
> ASLK-CGER Services GIE                          Tel.:  +32 2 228.55.74
> Rue Foss << File: ATT04852.txt >> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>