nv-l

Re: Stumped

1999-01-11 18:29:06
Subject: Re: Stumped
From: Vince Rosso <Vince_Rosso AT TRANSALTA DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:29:06 -0700


Vince [email protected]
11/01/99 04:29 PM

Are you using an snmp-server host (address) statement in your router
config?   It might be pointing to the old server ... just a thought or try
adding it if it doesn't have it already.



 (Embedded
 image moved   Craig Morgan <craig.morgan AT MINDSPRING DOT COM>
 to file:      01/11/99 04:19 PM
 pic26472.pcx)




Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
cc:    (bcc: Vince Rosso)
Subject:  Re: Stumped




I did use ovobjprint -s <devicename>. It does not show up in the database,
but I can do a snmpwalk from the command line.
Still stumped. Any suggestions are great.

-----Original Message-----
From:   Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
[mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu] On Behalf Of Rob Rinear
Sent:   Monday, January 11, 1999 10:25 AM
To:     NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
Subject:        Re: Stumped

Have you actually tested to make sure the connectivity and community
strings
are OK (using snmpget and/or the MIB browser) from the new box?  This can
help determine if the problem is in communications or with Netview.

Also, when you say that you cannot discover the router, do you mean that it
is not showing up on the map, or you have verified that the router (all
interfaces) do not show up anywhere in the databases?  If you have not
checked the databases, I'd use ovobjprint and ovtopdump to see if the
object
or any of its interfaces may be in the database incorrectly (and use
ovtopofix to correct).


Rob


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
[mailto:NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU]On Behalf Of Craig Morgan
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 1999 1:41 PM
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
Subject: Stumped


Hello all,

NetView V5.1 Install

Background information: The customer is upgrading from NetView V3.1 to
V5.1.
The older machine has the same IP address (they are not on the network at
the same time). When I try to discover the network I cannot discover one of
their Cisco Routers. I have discovered another router with the same Cisco
code (11.2.15A). The SNMP community strings are correct, but it's strange
because the older version of NetView shows the device. Also, the customer
has an access list on each router, but the older machine is still able the
see the device. Any suggestions would be great.

I didn't do it; Nobody saw me do it;
You can't prove anything

Attachment: pic26472.pcx
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>