Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Data retentions

2006-05-17 09:21:02
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Data retentions
From: jpiszcz.backup AT gmail DOT com (Justin Piszcz)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:21:02 -0400
Like I mentioned before, setup the policy to do in-line tape copy,
write at (least) two copies of the data to two separate volume pools
and then store the tapes in different locations.


On 5/17/06, Hindle, Greg <Greg.Hindle AT constellation DOT com> wrote:
> Can you elaborate how you do this in your environment?
>
>
>
> Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz.backup AT gmail DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:50 AM
> To: Hindle, Greg
> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Data retentions
>
> Any data you need to keep for > 1 year, I would make sure you are using
> in-line tape copy and writing to at least 2 different sets of tapes, the
> backup won't help if a tape goes bad.
>
> On 5/17/06, Hindle, Greg <Greg.Hindle AT constellation DOT com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > With all this talk about retentions, full vs. differentials vs.
> cumulative.
> > Most of our policy's here get daily differentials which are kept for 2
>
> > weeks, weekly fulls which are kept for 1 month. Some of our servers
> > get a monthly full which is kept for a year and our Sox servers get a
> > quarterly full which is kept for 3 years. Does anyone see any problems
>
> > with this setup? We are just about ready to start a policy condensing
> > project where we will use policy's based on data retentions and
> > hopefully cut the number of policy's we have by 70%. But we are also
> > revisiting how long we keep data as well. Suggestions / Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Greg >>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain
>
> > legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended
> > solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do
> > not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail
> > and notify the sender. CEG-IP2
> >
> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>