[Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support
2006-05-10 15:58:38
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support |
From: |
GreenbergKA AT aetna DOT com (Greenberg, Katherine A) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 15:58:38 -0400 |
Looks like they're about as supported as each other... under 6.0.
http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise
_Server/278064.pdf
Things that crack me up though, are things like... ITANIUM SUPPORT being
the cats meow! I mean, come on, did everyone out there seriously pick
Intel over AMD in the 64-bit platform arena?? (if you did, sorry)
~Kate
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:48 PM
To: Scott Jacobson
Cc: List Veritas List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:44:19AM -0600, Scott Jacobson wrote:
> Ed,
>
> What about the other "white meat". We have SLES 8 and 9 Linux boxes
> running as both Master and Media Servers.
Symantec doesn't support Brightmail on any Linux distribution other than
RHEL 3 AS and RHEL 3 ES. That should tell you something about their
Linux commitment too - after all, I'd put SLES in the same category as
RHEL for enterprise-quality (even though I've never worked with SLES).
I've not looked at NetBackup support on SLES at all.
.../Ed
>
> ;-)
>
> -sj
>
> >>> Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> 5/10/2006 10:17 AM >>>
> I regularly see postings from people looking to enhance their use of
> Linux as NetBackup servers. Although I am a *strong* Linux advocate
> and a Red Hat Certified Engineer, I would advise that you think long
> and hard about this decision. Symantec has not yet been able to
> demonstrate any willingness to support Red Hat Enterprise Linux as an
> enterprise platform.
>
> Fact: NetBackup 6.5, targeted for release in February, 2007, will
> drop support for RHEL 3. RHEL 3 started shipping in October, 2003 and
> will be supported by Red Hat through October, 2010. Symantec will cut
> you off with its current release nearly 4 years before Red Hat stops
> supporting the OS. On the other hand, Windows 2000, which was
> released
> 2 1/2 years earlier than RHEL 3, will still be supported by NetBackup
> 6.5.
> Additionally, mainstream support for Win2K server has already ended
> and
> full support will end from Microsoft *before* RHEL 3 support ends.
> This
> should show you where Symantec's priorities lie.
>
> Fact: Symantec Brightmail is not available for RHEL 4 so if you're
> deploying today, you have to deploy on RHEL 3. One Symantec
> enterprise product will soon be unable to back up another Symantec
> enterprise product. RHEL 4 has been out for over a year and still
> Symantec hasn't
> started supporting it. I just searched the support site for the system
> requirements in case my local office was wrong, and RHEL 4 still does
> not seem to be supported.
>
> Fact: NOM on Linux. Nope, it doesn't exist. Windows or Solaris
> only.
>
> Symantec doesn't seem to get it. I'm turning blue in the face trying
> to explain this to my local office. I know that there are Symantec
> folks on this list - feel free to pass this on. Symantec's actions do
> not go
> without notice.
>
> I've been asked by my management why we're not using Linux for
> NetBackup and I bluntly told them that Symantec can't be trusted to
> support the platform as it should be trusted. We recently replaced
> our master and one of our media servers and stuck with Solaris. We
> spent a lot more money but at least I know it will work.
>
> Enough rambling. If you have concerns about NetBackup and Linux
> support, contact your Symantec reps.
>
> .../Ed
>
> --
> Ed Wilts, RHCE
> Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
> Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org _______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-----------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this
e-mail in error, please advise the sender by reply
e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank you. Aetna
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, (continued)
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Greenberg, Katherine A
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, markjessup AT northwesternmutual DOT com
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Brooks, Jason
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Dhotre, Shekhar
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Greenberg, Katherine A
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Jeff Lightner
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support,
Greenberg, Katherine A <=
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Tristan Ball
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Conner, Neil
- [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support, Jeff Lightner
|
|
|