Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] tricking netbackup

2005-11-22 08:33:48
Subject: [Veritas-bu] tricking netbackup
From: pkeating AT bank-banque-canada DOT ca (Paul Keating)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:33:48 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EF69.5E97BEB6
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have a fileserver with a 800Gig SCSI attached array configured as S
drive.
=20
On Friday night it had a full backup, and on Sunday the data was
migrated to SAN attached disk on a different, but same configuration
server.
=20
A manual full was not performed, so when the schedule ran last night,
the cumulative took a long time to run......
I can't afford to run this cumulative every night.....matter of fact I
can't even afford to run a full now, as it will run into production
hours (can't hit the server or network with that right now)
=20
is there any way to make Netbackup think that the "server1" that had the
full on Friday night is the same machine as "server1san"?
The data is the same, and the system config is the same, just the system
name, and where the physical data is located has chaged (though the
directory structure and drive letter is the same.)
=20
Paul

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EF69.5E97BEB6
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have =
a fileserver=20
with a 800Gig&nbsp;SCSI attached array configured as S=20
drive.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>On =
Friday night it=20
had a full backup, and on Sunday the data was migrated to SAN attached =
disk on a=20
different, but same configuration server.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A =
manual full was=20
not performed, so when the schedule ran last night,&nbsp;the=20
cumulative&nbsp;took a long time to run......</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I =
can't afford to=20
run this cumulative every night.....matter of fact I can't even afford =
to run a=20
full now, as it will run into production hours (can't hit the server or =
network=20
with that right now)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>is =
there any way to=20
make Netbackup think that the "server1" that had the full on Friday =
night is the=20
same machine as "server1san"?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The =
data is the=20
same, and the system config is the same, just the system name, and where =
the=20
physical data is located has chaged (though the directory structure and =
drive=20
letter is the same.)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D444382813-22112005><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Paul</FONT></SPAN></DIV></BODY></HTML>
=00
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5EF69.5E97BEB6--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>