--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Dellaripa, Rich <rich.dellaripa AT cingular DOT com> [2005-08-14 21:59]:
> This reminded me of something I've been wondering about for a while; does
> checkpoint=20
> restart on backups introduce any sort of noticable performance penalty? I
> know there
> must be some overhead and probably more for to tape than to disk, but I'm
> wondering
> if turning it on should be an automatic "Best Practice" or not.

I can't imagine that it impacts all that much. We normally have 2G
fragments defined already and that's not a big deal. Isn't the default
on checkpoints every 15 minutes? For us, that would normally be several
fragments per checkpoint, which wouldn't slow down much.

--=20
David Rock
david AT graniteweb DOT com

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDACBxMrO4/Yb/xwYRAmNsAJ9spASD0OoEhLV/Nhc2WllXoJdi6gCgnWmI
R0oLr/OOSJ9EksL8FRyPX3g=
=Vu8J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--