Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Solaris slow BMR performance

2004-07-06 15:42:52
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Solaris slow BMR performance
From: Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA (Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:42:52 -0500
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 006C4B5F86256EC9_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

I'm running BMR 4.7.1(Mp1).

I hardcoded the switch to 100Mb FD. Solaris is seeing the link as 100Mb FD 
on both the bmr client and the bmr/nb_master server.

I'm currently getting 70K/sec.

The server and the client have NET_BUFFERS setup.

Maybe i need to put in an external procedure for NET_BUFFERS before NB 
runs. 



veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 07/06/2004 12:52:37 PM:

> What version of BMR are you running?
> Latest is 4.7. I would try setting your switch to
> hardcode 100MB/Full. Other than that, I haven't ran
> into any performance problems with BMR itself..
> 
> -Dennis Laube
> 
> 
> 
> --- Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm doing a test BMR of a client.
> > 
> > I'm getting slow performance when doing the restore.
> > specifically /, other 
> > larger data partitions seem to go quickly.
> > 
> > Switch is set to autoneg, solaris is set to autoneg.
> > Switch shows full 
> > duplex on the ports.
> > 
> > I'm using the Solaris 8 Feb 2004 release.
> > 
> > I'm wondering if anyone else ran into this?
> 
> 
> =====
> Reach me when I'm online:
> AOL IM: djlaube
> YIM: djlaube
> MSN: djlaube AT msn DOT com
> ICQ: 243471
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 

--=_alternative 006C4B5F86256EC9_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=3>I'm running BMR 4.7.1(Mp1).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3>I hardcoded the switch to 100Mb FD. Solaris is seeing
the link as 100Mb FD on both the bmr client and the bmr/nb_master server.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3>I'm currently getting 70K/sec.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The server and the client have NET_BUFFERS
setup.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Maybe i need to put in an external procedure
for NET_BUFFERS before NB runs. </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 
07/06/2004
12:52:37 PM:<br>
<br>
&gt; What version of BMR are you running?<br>
&gt; Latest is 4.7. I would try setting your switch to<br>
&gt; hardcode 100MB/Full. Other than that, I haven't ran<br>
&gt; into any performance problems with BMR itself..<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; -Dennis Laube<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; --- Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; Hi,<br>
&gt; &gt; <br>
&gt; &gt; I'm doing a test BMR of a client.<br>
&gt; &gt; <br>
&gt; &gt; I'm getting slow performance when doing the restore.<br>
&gt; &gt; specifically /, other <br>
&gt; &gt; larger data partitions seem to go quickly.<br>
&gt; &gt; <br>
&gt; &gt; Switch is set to autoneg, solaris is set to autoneg.<br>
&gt; &gt; Switch shows full <br>
&gt; &gt; duplex on the ports.<br>
&gt; &gt; <br>
&gt; &gt; I'm using the Solaris 8 Feb 2004 release.<br>
&gt; &gt; <br>
&gt; &gt; I'm wondering if anyone else ran into this?<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; =====<br>
&gt; Reach me when I'm online:<br>
&gt; AOL IM: djlaube<br>
&gt; YIM: djlaube<br>
&gt; MSN: djlaube AT msn DOT com<br>
&gt; ICQ: 243471<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br>
&gt; __________________________________<br>
&gt; Do you Yahoo!?<br>
&gt; New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!<br>
&gt; http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail <br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; Veritas-bu maillist &nbsp;- &nbsp;Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu<br>
&gt; http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu<br>
&gt; <br>
</tt></font>
--=_alternative 006C4B5F86256EC9_=--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>