Some have seen status 84 pop up after making 'somewhat 
drastic' changes to the number/size of the buffers in 
order to increase performance.

And when they (backups) are MPX'd it seems more common

Quoting Charles R Somogyi <charles.somogyi AT bms DOT com>:

> Some are MPX'd. Some are not. Seems to be a mix. I 
will chaeck
> for a buffer change. Could the buffer size change be 
impacting?
> If so, what is the thinking behind that?
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Charlie S.
>
> "David A. Chapa" wrote:
>
> > Are these particular backups MPX'd and have you or
> > someone on your team changed the number/size of the
> > buffers recently?
> >
> > Quoting Charles R Somogyi 
<charles.somogyi AT bms DOT com>:
> >
> > > Hello All:
> > >
> > > Anybody get an excessive amount of 84's in their 
3.2
> > NB on HPUX
> > > 11.00 environment? We use STK's and HP L700's.
> > Firmware is
> > > recent. We have 4 other environments just like 
this
> > one but the
> > > 84's are non-stop in this one environment.
> > > Easy enough fix (clean drive or replace media and
> > rerun job) but
> > > we have the operators running around all night 
fixing
> > these 84's.
> > >
> > > Charlie Somogyi
> > > Bristol Myers Squibb
> > > Princeton, NJ
> > > 609-818-3589
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Veritas-bu maillist  -
> > Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > >
> > 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-
> > bu
> > >
> >
> > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> > David A. Chapa
> > Consulting Manager
> > DataStaff, Inc.
> > 847 413 1144
> > http://www.consulting.datastaff.com
> > ---------------------------------------
> > http://www.xbpadm-commands.com
> > NBU-LSERV AT datastaff DOT com - Adv. Scripting
>
> 



<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
David A. Chapa
Consulting Manager
DataStaff, Inc.
847 413 1144
http://www.consulting.datastaff.com
---------------------------------------
http://www.xbpadm-commands.com
NBU-LSERV AT datastaff DOT com - Adv. Scripting