|
[Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable instance?
2012-04-19 12:39:38
Is it possible that a numeric backup could still be browsable
(sumflags=cb) but none of the older instances of that save set? In other
words, the preceding incrementals are 'cr' and the previous full is
also 'cr'?
Under what circumstances could this occur? Seems like the numeric would
still require the previous full to rebuild the save set as it existed at
that time, assuming the numeric is still browsable? I know this is true
with incrementals, anyway. Thought so ...
George
--
George Sinclair
Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or
unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable instance?,
George Sinclair <=
|
|
|
