Re: [Networker] Why isnt this browsable?
2012-04-02 15:58:48
måndag 02 april 2012 15:21:40 skrev Michael Leone:
> Beats me. :-) I know that I usually do "scanner -m", then an mminfo to
> determine what order the tape(s) were written, and then "scanner -i", in
> that order. I've been told (I believe by EMC Tech Support) that you *must*
> run "scanner -i" in the order shown by the mminfo, else the index is not
> properly rebuilt. And *I thought* that "nsrck -L6 (or -L7)" wouldn't work
> to re-read an index made by some other NW server; that in the case of
> using tapes from a "foreign" NW server, you have to use "scanner -i", and
> not "nsrck -L6/-L7".
>
> Perhaps that is wrong, and "nsrck -L6" would work ... not sure how, as the
> system would need to have "scanner -m" on an index saveset, so it knows
> what tape the index is on ...
No, no. What I meant is that you first run "scanner -i", then "nsrck -L6".
scanner -i will rebuild the index files (*.rec). nsrck -L6 will rebuild the
metafiles in the CFI and thus properly include the newly scanned in the CFI:s
so Networker can find them in the "normal" way.
This was needed to get files read in by "nsrck -L7" also not too long ago when
I needed it. -L7 was supposed to include all the lower levels, but it really
only loaded the *.rec files from tape...
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|