Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products
2005-10-29 05:29:17
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Davina Treiber wrote:
DT> Oscar Olsson wrote:
DT> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Ty Young wrote:
DT> >
DT> > TY> I would say 98% is quite good.
DT> > TY> TY> In my experience the Windows clients talk very nicely with Windows
DT> > or UNIX
DT> > TY> backup servers (NetWorker) and the failures I've seen with clients are
DT> > TY> usually due to
DT> > TY> TY> (a) client NICs left at auto-negotiate instead of being forced
DT> > 100/full
DT> >
DT> > Say what? Using anything else than auto-negotiation is stupid. Auto
DT> > negotiation has been a non-issue since the late 90s. However, I have seen
DT> > plenty of examples where a clueless administrator has turned off
DT> > auto-negotiation on the client, but left auto negotiation on on the
DT> > switch. This ofcourse results in that the switch will regard the port as
DT> > being in 100mbit/hdx mode, which will result in plenty of late collisions
DT> > and really poor performance.
DT> >
DT> > Please make yourself and the systems users a favour by using autoneg
DT> > everywhere.
DT> I beg to differ. I find it much more reliable to force everything to 100/FD.
DT> Auto-neg settings are the number one cause of slow and intermttently failing
DT> backups in most of the environments I have worked in, especially for Windows
DT> clients.
OK, you are the second one who tells me this. But I still claim that I
have seen several cases of poor performance in different brand
environments where speed and duplex has been set inconsistently. This
includes Cisco, HP and D-link switches.
Ofcourse there isn't a problem if one really sets both ends to 100/fdx,
but that generates some administrative work, and is likely to generate
errors at a later stage where one party gets replaced and the setting
isn't updated.
//Oscar
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|