Networker

Re: [Networker] Independent Full Backup

2003-08-13 06:16:45
Subject: Re: [Networker] Independent Full Backup
From: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:16:18 -0400
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 dbhasin AT HSS.HNS DOT COM wrote:

>Hi,
>Let me clear the scenarion,

>I am taking a Full Backup Set 1 to be kept at my localtion only for
>restorations and I need to take another set Set 2 which I need to trasfer
>to some remote location like Chennai now if I take Set 2 and than
>incremental backups it will rely on Set2 ( I dont want this dependency )
>for the time being I am taking Full Set1 and than Full Set2 and than
>incremental backups which removes dependency on Set1 and I am able to
>move Set1 to remote location but these 2 sets are taking a long time so
>how can I take Set 1 as independent set without dependency of incremental
>except cloning. Regards/Deepak

What you might want to do is look at cloning. Do a search on this list at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html for "clone" or cloning"
and you'll find a large amount of information.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=