wow, this issue is much more complex than would seem. something to further
complicate: when a tape is relabeled, does it use the same physical label,
or do you need to do what the term "relabel" would seem to indicate:
physically remove the old label and affix a new one?

michael brooks ............................... michaelb AT sequoiains DOT com
Network Administrator ........................ 831.657.4539 phone
Sequoia Insurance Company .................... 831.657.4512 fax


-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Horwitz [mailto:stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 5:46 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Re-labeling versus recycling?


On Thu, 1 May 2003, George Sinclair wrote:

>Ah, yes, now I see the logic. This could come in handy if you wanted to
>relabel only tapes that were elgible for recycling, and you didn't want
>to bother with having to wade through the volumes listing to check,
>especially if there were a lot of tapes, and you had a script doing
>this with both the 'N' and 'R' options.

This makes sense, but what I do in order to list out the recyclable tapes is
to grep the output of "nsrjb -v" for the string "yes", but using the -R
option looks more helpful.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email to
listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also view
and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=