Actually, the situation is a bit more complicated.

It seems to be a false alert, but I haven't found the exact problem 
yet.  The problem does not exist in version 5.2, but it does exist in 
7.0, 7.2, and 7.4., and the problem does not exist in the Enterprise 
Edition, so nothing is really fixed yet in the community version.  It is 
interesting that is has been "broken" since version 5.2 -- quite a long 
time.

For the moment it seems to be a trivial problem of the last block being 
"saved" too early before the checksum is computed so that checksum in 
the saved "last block" does not correspond to the block read back (i.e. 
most likely a false alert).  By the way, the failure occurs with either 
the single or the multiple tape test.

I am looking at the issue ...

Best regards,
Kern

On 01/27/2017 06:04 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 27/01/17 00:36, Caribe Schreiber wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm hoping someone can help point me in the right direction to get the
>> btape multivolume fill test to work under bacula-7.4.4.
> You can't. It's broken.
>
> It was fixed recently but that fix hasn't rolled into the public release
> stream yet
> (and it looks like there's still another but in the test part of the code)
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users