Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Off-site redundancy with volume replication?

2016-07-11 10:45:16
Subject: [Bacula-users] Off-site redundancy with volume replication?
From: Michael Munger <michael AT highpoweredhelp DOT com>
To: <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:44:22 -0400
I need to solve the "what if the office burns down" problem.

Is there a way to configure replication with Bacula? Suppose I have 50 x
50GB volumes that receive 250MB to 1G of new data per day. What's the
best way to replicate / copy / backup the backups offsite? My current
thought is to use rsync and sync volumes offsite. But, that seems
inefficient. Even if I make the volume sizes small (<5GB) I am still
going to be copying the entire 5GB volume if a single byte changes -
instead of the single byte.

Is there a better way to do this? Can I configure one director to ask
another "What's different on these volumes?" and then send only the
updated data?

MySQL does this with replication. Can Bacula do it?

Michael Munger, dCAP, MCPS, MCNPS, MBSS
High Powered Help, Inc.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist
Digium Certified Asterisk Professional
michael AT highpoweredhelp DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries
present their vision of the future. This family event has something for
everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today.
http://sdm.link/attshape
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>