Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] build RPM for FD 5.2 in CentOS 6

2016-04-14 09:48:26
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] build RPM for FD 5.2 in CentOS 6
From: Norbert Gomes <norbert.gomes AT univ-orleans DOT fr>
To: "bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:47:41 +0200
When I type the following command, I see that the FD is compiled with TCP Wrappers
So I think that they are enabled or am I wrong ?


# ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-fd  |grep wrap
   [...]
    libwrap.so.0 => /lib64/libwrap.so.0 (0x00007f8b778ea000)
   [...]


iptables are already configured for the port 9102 to be opened :
   41  2460 ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0           tcp dpt:9102


But we also have a ALL:ALL directive in the hosts.deny and this is the one that prevents the DIR to contact the FD
We use this combination of hosts.allow / hosts.deny files on other Distributions and it works.

No problem on the DIR side as it contacts successfully other FDs


That's why I can't understand :-)

Norbert



Le 14/04/2016 15:29, Clark, Patti a écrit :
Because tcp_wrappers is not configured for bacula by default.  Your hosts.allow file is not configured properly.  As this is not a linux list, please read up on tcp_wrappers, there is a lot of information available.  I would only use tcp_wrappers in a layered approach to security and only after using a firewall as my primary defense.

It would be more appropriate to use iptables to control access to the bacula ports.  Here are a couple of examples.  If you want tighter controls on your backup server and/or storage daemon server, research iptables configurations and test.  Perhaps someone on the list will contribute some of their examples of tighter firewall controls.

On the server and wide open:

-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 9101:9103 -j ACCEPT


On the client and only to the specific server replacing x.x.x.x with your bacula server’s ip address:

-A INPUT -s x.x.x.x -p tcp -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -m tcp --dport 9102 -j ACCEPT 


Patti


From: Norbert Gomes <norbert.gomes AT univ-orleans DOT fr>
Date: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 5:36 AM
To: "bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] build RPM for FD 5.2 in CentOS 6

My problem seems to be with TCP wrappers, but I don't understand why :

Like this, it doesn't work :

hosts.deny :
ALL: ALL

hosts.allow :
9102: ALL
bacula-fd: ALL


But if I comment the hosts.deny file (or put ALL: ALL in the hosts.allow file), it works.


I don't see where I made a mistake ?

My process running is :
root      1142     1  0 11:02 ?        00:00:00 bacula-fd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf -u root -g root


Norbert
Le 14/04/2016 09:58, Norbert Gomes a écrit :
Hi

Thank you for the repositories, it works on a test machine (fresh CentOS 6.2), but not in the production one : in this last, the DIR can't contact the FD ( iptables and TCP wrappers seem to be OK)

Maybe I missed something elsewhere.

I'll give a look

Regards

Norbert


Le 13/04/2016 12:47, Simone Caronni a écrit :
Hi Norbert,

I'm the Bacula mantainer for Fedora. can you use the rebuild I do of current packages for RHEL/CentOS and Fedora? You can upgrade directly from CentOS/RHEL packages straight to them.
They have all features enabled. Please read the included README file in bacula-common.


If you look on Google there's some history behind the packages.
Please note that only the 7.4 branch is supported.

Regards,
--Simone





On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Norbert Gomes <norbert.gomes AT univ-orleans DOT fr> wrote:
Hi

I have to build a rpm for the bacula-fd 5.2 in Cent OS 6, and follow
this page :
http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/utility/utility/Bacula_RPM_Packaging_FAQ.html

I downloaded and extracted the bacula-5.2.13.tar.gz file, then :

Looked at the bacula.spec.in file in "platforms/rpms/redhat/bacula.spec.in"

Tried to build with this command :

rpmbuild -ba --define "build_centos6 1" --define "build_client_only 1"
platforms/rpms/redhat/bacula.spec.in

But if fails with
error: line 457: empty tag: Distribution:

The line in the spec file is :
Distribution: %{_dist}


I think that the _dist variable is empty because in the precedent lines,
the centos6 condition is missing :

%if %{centos5} || %{centos4} || %{centos3}
%define _dist %(grep CentOS /etc/redhat-release)
%endif

If I add a centos6 condition, the same error message appears.

Anyone has an idea, or is there another way to build a RPM file ?

Regards

Norbert


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z


_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>