Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent tape jobs

2016-02-11 16:50:02
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent tape jobs
From: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To: bacula-users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:44:08 -0500
On Feb 9, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com> wrote:


On 2/8/2016 5:42 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello,

I am working with an LTO-4 tape library.  It has two drives but I plan to write to only one for backups.

I will backup to disk first, on another SD.  Later, I will copy the jobs to the tape library on this new SD
which is on another server.  The copy jobs will be spooled to local SSD before being written to tape.


Now what I'm thinking of is streaming multiple concurrent jobs to a single drive

Are the two servers on a 10G or better network? Unless the disk subsystem on the other SD is slow, it will likely stream close to the 1G max of 125 MB/s, since it will be essentially sequential reads. I'm not convinced that concurrency will gain anything.

No, it's a 1G network in my house.

-- 
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users