Re: [Bacula-users] bacula_t selinux problem

Hi Simone,

Thank you for the info! That's great!

-craig

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Simone Caronni <negativo17 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

Hello,

On 4 August 2015 at 03:37, Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
Many (if not all) have the permissions srw-rw-rw- on the object. With bacula_t set to permissive, the errors don't seem to occur. Besides the restore problem which I can get around and the one above, are there any other problems with leaving bacula_t enforced? Is the problem above something to be worried about? I rather leave bacula_t enforced if possible (unless it is not recommended).

I've been running Bacula with SELinux in enforcing mode for a few years now and did not have any issue. Error on sockets are not a problem, you can ignore those. They are created when the program starts.

Regards,
--Simone

--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users