Perhaps the user is referring to EFS, which is not supported by the
5.2.10 binaries.  However, the 7.0.5 version probably does support EFS,
though I haven't actually tested it in production.

Best regards,
Kern

On 28.07.2015 05:32, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 17/07/15 08:58 AM, paul22 wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would need your help on the Windows Binaries (Version 5.2.10).
>>
>> Is it compatible with Windows 7, 8.1, 2012 R2 64-bit UEFI, since I can’t do 
>> my backups.
>>
>> Finally, to be clearer for the Windows Binaries 7 64 Bit UEFI installed but 
>> couldn’t do backups, for Windows 8.1 and 2012 R2 64-bit UEFI Windows 
>> Binaries remains blocked during installation.
>>
>> Thank you your help.
>>
> I'm not sure what you mean about UEFI compatibility. I'm running the 
> 5.2.10 binaries on Windows 7/Pro 64bit without any problem. I'm not an 
> expert on UEFI but I don't see how that even comes into it.
>
> If the binaries installed OK, then you shouldn't have a problem. If you 
> are having a problem, check the passwords and ports to make sure that 
> they match between the client and server and that the ports are open 
> (not blocked by Windows firewall).
>
> Can you communicate between client and server through bconsole on either 
> machine?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users