Re: [Bacula-users] Why it takes so much to "Building directory tree"

Subject:	Re: [Bacula-users] Why it takes so much to "Building directory tree"
From:	f-otake <f-otake AT kinryokai DOT net>
To:	bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 05 Jul 2015 23:31:15 +0900

Thanks for Radosław Korzeniewski and Luc Van der Veken
I measure the time of Building directory tree on my previous case and it 
took only 12seconds.
also check free command when running.
             total       used       free     shared    buffers cached
Mem:       1020300     932360      87940        220      46276 341924
-/+ buffers/cache:     544160     476140
Swap:      2097148     660168    1436980

It maybe assign more to innodb_buffer_pool_size, but keep same setting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs fail with "duplicate key value violates unique constraint" after upgrade to 7.0.5, Christian Manal

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs fail with "duplicate key value violates unique constraint" after upgrade to 7.0.5, Kern Sibbald

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Why it takes so much to "Building directory tree", Radosław Korzeniewski

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Why it takes so much to "Building directory tree", Luc Van der Veken

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]