On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:56:42PM -0800, bradbpw wrote:
> More info.  I ran a iperf test, it seems oddly high, there is no way these 
> can be the actual transfer rates, right?
> 
> 
> brad@home-server:~$ iperf -c 63.227.74.80 -p 9102 -f Kbytes -i 1 -t 10

Even more info is needed... db backend used, Number of files in backup
job, clientfilesystem type & memory config, bacula director hardware
etc. 

Cheers, Uwe 

-- 
NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users