Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd crashes on FreeBSD 9.2

2013-10-16 11:37:59
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd crashes on FreeBSD 9.2
From: dweimer <dweimer AT dweimer DOT net>
To: David Newman <dnewman AT networktest DOT com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:35:21 -0500
On 10/09/2013 6:41 pm, David Newman wrote:
> FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE, bacula-client-5.2.12_3 installed from ports
> 
> Ever since upgrading this host to FreeBSD 9.2, bacula-fd crashes as 
> soon
> as bacula-dir starts a backup job. The entry in /var/log/messages is:
> 
> Oct  9 16:25:50 o bacula-fd: Bacula interrupted by signal 0: UNKNOWN 
> SIGNAL
> 
> Backups worked fine on this host running FreeBSD 9.1 and other hosts
> upgraded to FreeBSD 9.2 run backups OK.
> 
> I've done the uninstall/reinstall thing with the bacula-client port, 
> but
> that made no difference.
> 
> Thanks in advance for troubleshooting clues.
> 
> dn
> 
> 

David,

    I have hit this on one of my servers as well, I have two upgraded to 
9.2, both built from source upgraded from 9.1p7 to 9.2.  There are some 
differences, one is the Bacula server, and exists entirely to manage 
backups.  The other is a web / email server, the web / email server is 
working fine, the Bacula server was working fine, and has now hit the 
problem yours has, oddly enough, I can run the database backup just 
fine, its just the normal backup that fails.

    I have a backup running now though, keeping my fingers crossed, as 
its actually made it past the point it normally fails, and I am 
wondering, is it that I selected a full backup instead of incremental?  
Since the catalog backup that's full is working, this makes me curious, 
have you ran into this problem on full backups or just incremental 
backups?

    I haven't been able to find any difference's in the Bacula 
dependencies on either of the systems, they are all running at the same 
revision levels, I am using lzo compression on both (tried disabling, 
didn't stop crash), both systems are running on ZFS file system, both 
zpools have been upgraded after the update, both run the same script to 
generate database dumps, and take ZFS snapshots before backup, there is 
a different list of file sets to snapshot, and backup, but that's it.  
The web / email server does have a lot of additional ports installed 
that the Bacula server doesn't.  And of course the Bacula server is 
running both the bacula-sd and bacula-dir in addition to the bacula-fd 
service.


-- 
Thanks,
    Dean E. Weimer
    http://www.dweimer.net/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users