Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Why does bacula insist on autolabeling with TestA-n?

2013-07-25 13:19:05
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Why does bacula insist on autolabeling with TestA-n?
From: Barak Griffis <senor_vaquero AT glitch-cowboy DOT com>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:12:56 -0500
So when I make a config change I need to 'reload' and 'update xxx' ?
Barak

On 2013-07-25 09:21, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Barak Griffis
> <senor_vaquero AT glitch-cowboy DOT com> wrote:
>> I restarted all 3 daemons many times, but no I didn't 'update pool 
>> from
>> resource'
>> What I did do was move all of my configs aside, and install the 
>> default
>> configs and configure a bare-bones setup that would do auto-labelling
>> correctly and then merged my customizations into the default, working
>> config while testing along the way.  I think what may have been the
>> culprit was defining a Storage resource within the pool definition.
>> When I moved the Storage definition to the job level and leave it out 
>> of
>> the pool, auto-labelling seems to work.
>> 
>> Does that sound reasonable or was it a side-effect?
> 
> Changes in the config files like this will not get applied unless you
> use the update commands (restarting does not help since the configs
> need to be applied to the db).
> 
> John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users