|
Dear
all,
I'm currently
completely redefining my Bacula setup and plan now to use Virtual Full
backups
for some of my
bigger servers.
I've now defined the
necessary two pools but am unsure now if it is a good practice to
create a "loop" in
these pools:
Pool
{
Name =
Pool1
....
Next Pool =
Pool2
}
Pool
{
Name =
Pool2
...
Next Pool =
Pool1
}
I googled a lot and
found some concerns that these configuration can cause a deadlock, is that
right?
But at other places
I found this setup recommended...
So I'm now
completely unsure how to proceed.
If not using that
loop I found that the Virtual Full backups alternate between the two pools but
the
differential and
incremental are always done to the first pool. What I would like is that
all diff and incr
backups are done to
that pool that has the most recent full backup and I think that will be
possible
by defining the loop
above, right?
So.... how do you
configure your Virtual Full? What is the best practice for
it?
And... how likely is
it that a deadlock can/will occur?
Thanks a
lot!!
Christian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
| 