On 2012-10-09 06:12, lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de wrote:
> Hello
>
> when evaluating a new backup solution for our company we have focused
> at Bacula mostly because of some nice features like data spooling,
> broad client support and so on, but the "killer-feature" in our case
> was the data encryption with its straight forward design.

Thank you

> Unfortunately we now have spot some bugs like
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1936 and
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1940

To be fair, 1936 was opened 8 days ago, and contains a patch.  Give it 
time.

> and especially the won't fix
> comment for Bug#1940 sounds like "don't use data encryption".

No, the comment in 1940 is: use VSS.

> So in our case the question is if there are actually any
> "success-stories" for Bacula data encryption, or if we are beating a
> dead horse.

Yes, it is used by many on a regular basis from what I can tell.

-- 
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users