Zitat von lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de:

> Zitat von John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:35 AM,  <lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Zitat von John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Pubudu Perera
>>>> <suharshan22 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>>>> Thank John!
>>>>> So, that means there's no way to does the job simultaneously ?
>>>>>
>>>> You could run 2 concurrent jobs (one to each storage) but that would
>>>> cause 2 times the load on your client.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>
>>> But not with Windows Clients and VSS enabled. With this only one job
>>> at a time is started and subsequent jobs have to wait until the first
>>> finish :-(
>>>
>>
>> For that you may (depending on your setup) be able to work around the
>> bug/issue by dividing your fileset up to the part that needs VSS and
>> all the rest and then run 4 jobs instead of 2.
>>
>> John
>
> Hmm, looks like a single VSS job block all others regardless if they
> use VSS or not. So one have to create a (small) VSS job and isolate
> them from all others :-(
>

Even worse it looks like parallel backups jobs with data encryption  
are crashing the FD at least on Windows.

Windows Event Log:
Fehlgeschlagene Anwendung bacula-fd.exe, Version 0.0.0.0,  
fehlgeschlagenes Modul libeay32.dll, Version 0.0.0.0, Fehleradresse  
0x0000bbd7.

Andreas



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users