On 5 October 2012 02:35, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Pubudu Perera <suharshan22 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'm a newbie to Bacula and want to verify whether my requirement can get
>> done using bacula.
>> I want to know whether it's possible to simultaneously make  backups to
>> local HDD and Amazon S3 from the same source in Bacula.
>>
>> Can someone please help me with this?
>> Thanks in advance.
>
> I would backup to the local drive then mirror that with rsync to S3
> via s3fs fuse.
>
> John
>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

>>From my experience using s3cmd is much more reliable than s3fs.
There's a sync command in s3cmd that acts like rsync, it's probably
more efficient with bandwidth as well. You could run s3cmd in a post
job script and set the job to error if the s3cmd sync command fails.


Ed