Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] no more appenable volumes -- what's the preferred way to handle this

2012-10-08 05:15:09
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] no more appenable volumes -- what's the preferred way to handle this
From: lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:12:28 +0200
Zitat von mayak-cq <mayak AT australsat DOT com>:

> hi all,
>
> i have a bacula instance that's been running fine for a long while ...
>
> i was able to tweak the volume retention to keep a maximum number of
> backups available, until, a user saved a gigantic amount of (valuable)
> data to his disk.
>
> so -- i now have no appendable volumes left to backup to:
>
> - what is the best way to deal with this -- that is -- is there a way to
> globally reduce the volume retention of all volumes?
> - do i manually recycle a bunch of volumes by hand?

To my knowledge you can alter the retention at Pool level and update  
all Pool-Members at once.

Regards

Andreas



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users