Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 18:54:46
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)
From: James Harper <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
To: Stephen Thompson <stephen AT seismo.berkeley DOT edu>, Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:52:05 +0000
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I ran some btape tests today to verify that I'd be improving throughput by
> changing blocksize from 256KB to 2MB and found that this does indeed
> appear to be true in terms of increasing compression efficiency, but it
> doesn't seem to affect incompressible data much, if at all.  Still, it seems
> worth changing and I thank you for pointing me in that direction.
> 
> More importantly, I realized that my testing 6 months ago was not on all
> 4 of my drives, but only 2 of them.  Today, I discovered one of my drives
> (untested in the past) is getting 1/2 the throughput for random data writes as
> the others!!
> 

Is it definitely LTO3 and definitely using LTO3 media? LTO2 was about half the 
speed, including using LTO2 media in an LTO3 drive.

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users