Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed

2012-08-21 08:55:47
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:51:50 +0100
On 21/08/12 13:00, lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de wrote:

> Of course but the manual as far as i understand explicitely discourage
> altering the value for Block Size with modern hardware: "On most
> modern tape drives, you will not need to specify this directive.."

That's on the basis that 64k is universal. Some older drives can't even 
handle blocks this big.

> With this in mind i really wonder how many Bacula installations setup
> the last 5 years are running with shoe-shining tape drives despite the
> fact that Bacula can do better.

Not very many. The vast majority of bacula installations use disk 
volumes, not tape - which is why debugging tape problems can take so long.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users