Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula jobs use volumes from the wrong pool - bug?

2012-07-06 14:04:06
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula jobs use volumes from the wrong pool - bug?
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 19:01:18 +0100
>>>>> On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:35:15 -0700, Stephen Thompson said:
> 
> Hello again,
> 
> Here's something even stranger...  Another Full job logs that it's 
> written to a volume in the Full pool (FB0956), but then the status 
> output of the job lists a volume in the Incremental pool (IM0093).  This 
> Incremental volume was never even mentioned in the log as a volume to 
> which the job despooled.

It could be a database problem (the volumes listed in the status output come
from a query).  What is the output of the sql commands below?

SELECT VolumeName,JobMedia.* FROM JobMedia,Media WHERE JobMedia.JobId=242323 
AND JobMedia.MediaId=Media.MediaId;

SELECT MediaId,VolumeName FROM Media WHERE Media.VolumeName in 
('IM0093','FB0956');

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users