Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Different director and storage (in separate hw)?

2012-04-14 08:19:05
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Different director and storage (in separate hw)?
From: "Timo Neuvonen" <timo-news AT tee-en DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:16:55 +0300
>>>> Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the
>>>> Director
>>>> and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
>>>>
>>>> Is this because of some shared library versions or something else 
>>>> "single
>>>> host environment"- related?
>>>>
>>>> I'm migrating my old CentOS 5.x-32 system with Bacula 5.0.3, to CentOS
>>>> 6.2-64, with Bacula 5.2.6.
>>>>
>>>> I'm very tempted to have an intermediate step (for just a few days) 
>>>> with
>>>> the old storage (running in the old hw) and the new director (in the 
>>>> new
>>>> hw).
>>>>
>>>> So both the director and storage would be of 5-generation with 
>>>> different
>>>> minor numbers, and everything running in any single host, would be of
>>>> exactly the same version.  Any chance this combination might work?
>>>>
>>>> Of course, as long as I had that cocktail in use, I wouldn't touch the
>>>> conf
>>>> files for no other reason but to edit machine names where necessary. So
>>>> no
>>>> attempt to use any new features... if the communication protocols 
>>>> between
>>>> the daemons haven't changed, I guess there shouln't be anything
>>>> wrong -unless the daemons explicitly check the version info.
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Why would you like to have different versions of DIR and SD installed on
>>> the same machine?
>> I must have expressed myself unclearly. So, absolutely they wouldn't be 
>> on
>> the same machine. The old SD on old the hw, the new DIR on the new hw. 
>> But
>> can this combination work together?
>>
>> Reason for this idea: I try to keep downtime at minimum (this is much 
>> more
>> than just a backup server), and I would configure new director etc on the
>> new system, and start using it (among other non-backup-related services).
>> However, I want to keep old system still functional, and my tape hw is 
>> still
>> attached to that old system.
>>
>> --
>> TiN
>
> Well, officially it's recommended to keep DIR and SD at the same
> version, but I accidentally discovered that even DIR 5.2.6 (on FreeBSD)
> and SD 5.0.3 (on Debian) work together just fine.

Ok, that's a good reference for me, exactly the same combination.
An my setup won't be permanent, just for a few days to make sure everything 
else works first.

Thanks!

--
TiN 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users