Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Full backup fails after a few days with "Fatal error: Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=Interrupted system call"

2011-09-26 12:05:44
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Full backup fails after a few days with "Fatal error: Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=Interrupted system call"
From: Marcus Hallberg <marcus AT wimlet DOT se>
To: jma AT schaubroeck DOT be
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:44:48 +0200 (CEST)
Hi!

I ran into this today too.

Does anyone know if it has been implemented?

/marcus 
-- 



/Marcus Hallberg 
Wimlet Consulting AB 
Gamla Varvsgatan 1 
414 59 Göteborg 
Tel: 031-3107000 
Direkt 031-3107010 
e-post: marcus AT wimlet DOT se 
hemsida: www.wimlet.se 

----- Ursprungligt meddelande -----
Från: "Jeremy Maes" <jma AT schaubroeck DOT be>
Till: "R. Leigh Hennig" <rlh1533 AT gmail DOT com>
Kopia: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Skickat: måndag, 26 sep 2011 16:28:23
Ämne: Re: [Bacula-users] Full backup fails after a few days with "Fatal error: 
Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=Interrupted system call"

Op 26/09/2011 16:01, R. Leigh Hennig schreef:
> Morning,
>
> I have a client that whenever I try to do a full backup, after 6 days, 
> the backup fails with this error:
>
> Fatal error: Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=Interrupted 
> system call
>
>
> In bacula-dir.conf, for that job definition, I have this:
>
> Full Max Run Time = 1036800
>
> So it should be able to run for up to 12 days, but after the 6th day, 
> it's stopping. During that time it writes about 4.7 TB (with another 1 
> TB to go). Running CentOS 5.5 with Bacula 5.0.2. Any thoughts?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
Bacula has a hardcoded time limit on jobs of 6 days. Kern called it an 
"insanity check" as any job that runs that long isn't really something 
you'd want ...

See 
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT 
net/msg20159.html 
for a discussion on the mailing list from the past, and a pointer on 
where to change the time limit in the code if you wish.

Last time this was asked on the list someone pointed to a possible 
configuration option to override the hardcoded limit that should've been 
added by now, but given the 0 responses to that I can't say if it 
actually exists.

Regards,
Jeremy

 **** DISCLAIMER ****
http://www.schaubroeck.be/maildisclaimer.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users